Optimizing Undergraduate Pilot Training 2.5 at Vance Air Force Base
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2023v11i1-2.pp15-20Keywords:
Pilot Training, Simulation, Process ImprovementAbstract
With a continued increase in demand for qualified pilots, in an environment of continual budget constraints, the Air Education Training Command has been searching for ways to streamline Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT). Leadership has recently implemented UPT 2.5 to train pilots more effectively. However, the 8th and 33rd Flight Training Squadrons at Vance Air Force Base have had issues efficiently cycling students through. Although UPT 2.5 specifies that it takes no more than 90 days for students to complete the post-preflight portion of the syllabus, it currently takes 126 days on average. We developed a discrete event simulation model of pilot training to identify bottlenecks in the current system, find an optimal class size given current resources, and optimize resources to graduate 32 students per class, the number required by AETC. The results will inform recommendations to increase efficiency within UPT and reduce the pilot shortage.
References
Erickson, B. (2014). Simulation Modeling of Advanced Pilot Training: The Effects of a New Aircraft Family of Systems.
Master’s Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology.
Okal, A. (2008). Simulation Modeling and Analysis of F-16 Pilot Training Squadron. Master’s Thesis, Air Force Institute of
Technology.
Ostroski, J. (2022). T6 Graduation Data from November 2022. Vance AFB.
Shufeldt, Colby (2020). The Operational Imperative. White paper, Vance AFB.
Stewart, P. A. (2022). T-6A Undergraduate Pilot Training, AETC Syllabus P-V4A-U. Vance AFB.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.
