Analyzing and Evaluating Alternatives for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle Powertrain


  • Kobie Budak
  • Charlton Epperson
  • Will Forna
  • Thomas Liuzzo
  • Benjamin Sullivan
  • Vikram Mittal



Vehicle Design, Reliability, Powertrain Analysis


The United States Army relies on its fleet of combat vehicles to allow for freedom to maneuver on the battlefield. In turn, these vehicles rely on their powertrains, particularly, the engine and transmission, to properly function. This study evaluates the benefits obtained from upgrading the powertrain for the family of medium-tracked vehicles, focusing on the M2A3 Bradley Fighting Vehicle. These benefits are quantified by changes in performance, reliability, and sustainability through the use of a value model. The value model provides an overall score that quantifies for the benefit of upgrading the engine. Vehicle performance is captured through a tractive-effort analysis which converts engine and transmission performance data to vehicle performance measures. Reliability is modeled through a bottom-up component analysis. The study presents a drive-cycle analysis for the M2A3 to estimate the amount of fuel consumption to provide a sustainability metric. The study found that while some improvement can be realized through changing the engine, a much larger benefit can be gained from modifying both the engine and transmission.


Banks, J., Hines, J., Lebold, M., Campbell, R., & Begg, C. (2001). “Failure modes and predictive diagnostics considerations for diesel engines.” Proceedings of the 55th Meeting of the Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology.

Feickert, A. (2016). The Army's Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV): Background and Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service, Washington DC.

Gebicke, M.E. (1988). “Bradley Vehicle: Status of Transmission’s Reliability.” United States General Accounting Office, Document Number GAO/NSIAD-88-149FS, Washington DC, United States.

Gillespie, T. D. (1992). Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics (Vol. 114). SAE Technical Publications.

Grummitt D. “Bradley Fighting Vehicle: The US Army's Combat-Proven Fighting Platform, 1981-2021.” Bradley Fighting Vehicle. 2021:1-64.

Jennings, H. P. (2015). Built to Last: The Army's Failed Quest to Replace the Bradley Fighting Vehicle. US Army School for Advanced Military Studies, Fort Leavenworth, United States.

Raffa, C., Schwarz, E., & Tasdemir, J. (2005). Combat vehicle engine selection methodology based on vehicle integration considerations (No. 2005-01-1545). SAE Technical Paper.



How to Cite

Budak, K., Epperson, C., Forna, W., Liuzzo, T., Sullivan, B., & Mittal, V. (2022). Analyzing and Evaluating Alternatives for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle Powertrain. Industrial and Systems Engineering Review, 10(2), 135-141.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>